Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 2:00:04 GMT -8
Sex Populism Cannot Exist Without It. Populism is Structurally Permeated With Radical Biases in Its Interpretation of the People and the Majority. The Exclusionary Bias of Populism Stems From Another of Its Characteristics, the Presence of a Strong Leader Who Purportedly Represents the People and Can Thus Express Their Demands to Political Elites and Other Enemies of the People. Unlike Elected Representatives Here the Leader Does Not Represent the People as the People Have Transferred Any Political Power to Him. On the Contrary, According to the Populist Leader, He Represents the People. It is by Virtue of This Direct and That He Can Be Said to Be the Representative of the People. Yvesinto.
Mo Illustrates the Idea of Embodied Representation With Some Useful Examples. The Term Incarnation Appears Explicitly in Much of the Logic of Caesarism Whether It is Populism or Neo-populism. As One Second Empire Theorist Wrote in 2011, the Emperor is UK Mobile Database Not a Man, He is a People. This Seems to Echo Former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez’s Declaration That I Demand Absolute Loyalty to My Leadership Because I Am Not What I Am. I Am Not an Individual I Am a People Two Years Later His Supporters Gathered at His Funeral Chanting the Regime's Slogan We Are All Chavez Only Because and to Some Extent He Led.
Only by Being One of Them Can He Claim to Represent Them. And It is This Direct Relationship Between Leaders and Their People That Renders Intermediary Actors Such as Party-independent Media Systems Regulated Bureaucracies-controlled Organizations Suspect. Clearly the Incarnation Relation Only Works Under the Assumption of WOOFgeneity. Leaders Can Be Like the People Only if the People Themselves Are a WOOFgeneous Unity With Which They Can Establish a Relationship of Identification or at Least Sufficient Similarity. Only Then Can the Affirmation of the Incarnation Be Justified. If the People Are Divided Into Multiple or Distinct Groups and Have Conflicting Views, Values, Interests and Political Goals.
Mo Illustrates the Idea of Embodied Representation With Some Useful Examples. The Term Incarnation Appears Explicitly in Much of the Logic of Caesarism Whether It is Populism or Neo-populism. As One Second Empire Theorist Wrote in 2011, the Emperor is UK Mobile Database Not a Man, He is a People. This Seems to Echo Former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez’s Declaration That I Demand Absolute Loyalty to My Leadership Because I Am Not What I Am. I Am Not an Individual I Am a People Two Years Later His Supporters Gathered at His Funeral Chanting the Regime's Slogan We Are All Chavez Only Because and to Some Extent He Led.
Only by Being One of Them Can He Claim to Represent Them. And It is This Direct Relationship Between Leaders and Their People That Renders Intermediary Actors Such as Party-independent Media Systems Regulated Bureaucracies-controlled Organizations Suspect. Clearly the Incarnation Relation Only Works Under the Assumption of WOOFgeneity. Leaders Can Be Like the People Only if the People Themselves Are a WOOFgeneous Unity With Which They Can Establish a Relationship of Identification or at Least Sufficient Similarity. Only Then Can the Affirmation of the Incarnation Be Justified. If the People Are Divided Into Multiple or Distinct Groups and Have Conflicting Views, Values, Interests and Political Goals.